If you want your brows to be fuller or fluffier, you have several avenues to choose from! Two possible avenues are lamination and microblading. These pioneering brow treatments both offer breathtaking results. But what’s the difference between lamination vs. microblading, and which should you use? We offer a brief introduction to each below.


Lamination is like a perm for the brows. A professional uses a perming agent to break down the keratin bonds in the brow hairs, which makes them malleable and easier to mold. Then, they brush the brow hairs into their new shape and freeze them in place with a setting formula. Oftentimes, laminations are paired with a brow tint.

The result is darker, fuller, and newly shaped brows that require minimal aftercare and effort to maintain. Lamination results last between four and six weeks. Once the results start to fade, you need to get your brows re-laminated if you want to maintain the look.


Microblading is a popular semi-permanent brow treatment. During microblading, a professional runs a blade-shaped tool lined with tiny needles across the brows in hair-like strokes. These prickly needles are covered in pigment, which tints the skin with each stroke to darken and fill in the brow area.

In essence, microblading is a lot like getting a tattoo, but the result is less permanent. Microblading results last for one to two years, at which point you’ll need to schedule a follow-up treatment.

Which Is Better?

Now that you know the difference between lamination vs. microblading, you might wonder which of the two is the better choice. The answer all comes down to what you’re looking for.

For people who aren’t afraid of a little pain, microblading offers stunning, persevering results. Lamination results are less permanent, but the treatment is quicker, less costly, and less invasive; plus, lamination allows you to try out a whole new brow shape! Both treatments have their pros and cons, so choose the one that sounds the most appealing to you.